Thursday, September 29, 2005

I guess tunes are cheaper than body armor

Both of these stories are up on Raw Story at the same time:

1. Receive 3 FREE iTunes music downloads when you sign up to be contacted by the Army National Guard!


2.Troops Wait for Body Armor Reimbursements
Nearly a year after Congress demanded action, the Pentagon has still failed to figure out a way to reimburse soldiers for body armor and equipment they purchased to better protect themselves while serving in Iraq.


Is it even possible to be this stupid on purpose?

Sing, sing, sing

from E&P, The Queen speaks:
I went to jail to preserve the time-honored principle that a journalist must respect a promise not to reveal the identity of a confidential source. I chose to take the consequences -- 85 days in prison -- rather than violate that promise. The principle was more important to uphold than my personal freedom.

I am leaving jail today because my source has now voluntarily and personally released me from my promise of confidentiality regarding our conversations relating to the Wilson-Plame matter. My attorneys have also reached agreement with the Office of Special Counsel regarding the nature and scope of my testimony, which satisfies my obligation as a reporter to keep faith with my sources.

This enables me to appear before the Grand Jury tomorrow.

Remember Matt Cooper's convenient hail-Mary waiver reception on the courthouse steps, narrowly avoiding his own jail time? One has to wonder if the prospect of ciminal contempt charges was the factor that suddenly made Scooter's oft-offered waiver suddenly seem sufficently uncoerced.

Jeebus, how did it come to this? How did we come to a juncture where a good leftie has to ridicule the newspaper that printed the Pentagon Papers and exposed the Tuskegee experiment? How did the very concept of a free press become so utterly corrupted?

The outing of Valerie Plame was a heinous crime, and the piper really should be paid. I hope this sudden development signals a climax that befits the criminal hubris that put these forces in motion.

Go get 'em, Mr. Fitzgerald.

Update: good discussion here, and here, but I think we are all shooting in the dark tonight.

I like it

via Raw Story:
VELVETREVOLUTION LAUNCHES 'GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY REWARD FUND'

$100,000 REWARD FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST AND CONVICTION OF CORRUPT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS


VR today launches the 'Government Accountability Reward Fund' to induce whistleblowers to come forward with information about criminal activity by high government officials. Specifically, VR has a reward of up to $100,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of officials involved in the following three incidents: 1) the illegal outing of CIA Agent Valerie Plame, 2) the illegal payment of bribes to Congressman Dennis Hastert, and 3) the rigging of the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio. In the event more than one person provides information or information about more than one incident, the money will be split between the persons.


Perhaps Dame Judith could claim her $100K and make up some of the income lost while in stir?

Judy Miller Walks...

from the Philly Inquirer via Judy Miller Walks... Developing... | The Huffington Post:

Judith Miller, The New York Times reporter who has been jailed since July 6 for refusing to identify a source, has been released, The Philadelphia Inquirer has learned.

Miller left an Alexandria, Va. jail at 3:55 p.m., a jail official said.

She was released after she had a telephone conversation with the Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, sources said. In that conversation, Libby reaffirmed that he had released Miller from a promise of confidentiality more than a year ago, sources said.


I dunno what to read into the fact that the Queen of Iraq is out. If the "sources" are correct, then I think this is good news. WHich would mean that tomorrow (Friday, natch) will be a good day for the Preznit to announce his SCOTUS nominee.

Other than probably mooting my next long piece on the Plame outing, I don't really know how this plays out. Naming Libby doesn't get much converage in this scandal-rich environment. If Fitzgerald wants to make a mark, we are going to need a few high-profile indictments.

What do y'all think it means?

The case of the snark-proof story

So Newsweek lets a sliver of reality in, but where the hell are the rest of the MSM on this?
Sept. 28, 2005 - U.S. intelligence officials and counterterrorism analysts are questioning whether a slain terrorist—described by President Bush today as the “second-most-wanted Al Qaeda leader in Iraq”—was as significant a figure as the Bush administration is claiming.

In a brief Rose Garden appearance Wednesday morning, Bush seized on the killing of Abu Azzam by joint U.S-Iraqi forces in a shootout last Sunday as fresh evidence that the United States is turning the tide against the Iraqi insurgency.

“This guy was a brutal killer,” Bush told reporters in remarks that were also carried live on cable TV. “He was one of [Abu Mussab al-]Zarqawi’s top lieutenants. He was reported to be the top operational commander of Al Qaeda in Baghdad.”

Bush’s comments came one day after Gen. Richard Myers, the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon that the U.S. military considered Abu Azzam the “No. 2 Al Qaeda operative in Iraq, next to Zarqawi.”

But veteran counterterrorism analyst Evan Kohlmann said today there are ample reasons to question whether Abu Azzam was really the No. 2 figure in the Iraqi insurgency. He noted that U.S. officials have made similar claims about a string of purportedly high-ranking terrorist operatives who had been captured or killed in the past, even though these alleged successes made no discernible dent in the intensity of the insurgency.

If I had a nickel for every No. 2 and No. 3 they’ve arrested or killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, I’d be a millionaire,” says Kohlmann, a New York-based analyst who tracks the Iraq insurgency and who first expressed skepticism about the Azzam claims in a posting on The Counterterrorism Blog (counterterror.typepad.com). While agreeing that Azzam—also known as Abdullah Najim Abdullah Mohamed al-Jawari—may have been an important figure, “this guy was not the deputy commander of Al Qaeda,” says Kohlmann.



Come on, the rest of you MSM idiots. The good folks at Blogenlust have done your goddamned homework for you, and listed 32 -- thirty two -- previous lieutenants offered up the same way, with similar fanfare, over the last few years. In a week or a month, they are going to announce the same story yet again. So bookmark this list, and cut and past it into your coverage next time. Easy. Painless. And, on the off chance you still give a rat's ass, accurate for once.

Yeah, I know. If you point out that they have been feeding you shit, you will perforce have to admit swallowing it. But the "double down" gambling scheme only works for so long, folks. Sooner or later, you hit the table limit, and your markers are going to get called.

2 Political Junkies: ABSOLUT CORRUPTION.

You're missing the point

Guardian Unlimited - US forces 'out of control', says Reuters chief

Reuters has told the US government that American forces' conduct towards journalists in Iraq is "spiralling out of control" and preventing full coverage of the war reaching the public.

The detention and accidental shootings of journalists is limiting how journalists can operate, wrote David Schlesinger, the Reuters global managing editor, in a letter to Senator John Warner, head of the armed services committee.

The Reuters news service chief referred to "a long parade of disturbing incidents whereby professional journalists have been killed, wrongfully detained, and/or illegally abused by US forces in Iraq".

Mr Schlesinger urged the senator to raise the concerns with Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who is due to testify to the committee this Thursday.

He asked Mr Warner to demand that Mr Rumsfeld resolve these issues "in a way that best balances the legitimate security interests of the US forces in Iraq and the equally legitimate rights of journalists in conflict zones under international law".

At least 66 journalists and media workers, most of them Iraqis, have been killed in the country since March 2003.

US forces admitted killing three Reuters journalists, most recently soundman Waleed Khaled, who was shot by American soldiers on August 28 while on assignment in Baghdad. But the military said the soldiers were justified in opening fire. Reuters believes a fourth journalist working for the agency, who died in Ramadi last year, was killed by a US sniper.

"The worsening situation for professional journalists in Iraq directly limits journalists' abilities to do their jobs and, more importantly, creates a serious chilling effect on the media overall," Mr Schlesinger wrote.


Boy, are you unclear on the concept. Having a website where grunts show their trophy corpses is out of control. Systematically preventing journalists from reporting the full story in Iraq? That's one of the few goals Rumsfeld seems to be capable of accomplishing.

If you want to show the public what is really going on over there, well pal, you are the moral equivalent of Al Qaeda, and standing orders are going to have a chilling effect -- morgue-slab cold.

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Maybe he buys them at Walmart

Via Cunning Realist, Blogenlust has an amazingly long list of al-Zarqawi's "lieutenants," who show an amazing ability to spring up and replace the ones we whack. Pretty damned impressive -- he sems to have more lieutenants than you'd find at a West Point graduation.

Army ends probe on porn site photos of Iraq corpses

The U.S. Army after a brief inquiry has failed to determine whether U.S. soldiers provided grisly photos of people killed in the Iraq war to a porn Web site in exchange for free access to it, officials said on Wednesday.

The numerous graphic pictures posted on the Web site showed men, with their faces visible and wearing what looked like U.S. military uniforms, standing over a charred corpse, mutilated dead bodies and severed body parts.

The porn Web site states the photos were provided by troops in Iraq as well as Afghanistan in order to get free access to its sexual images. Many of the photos, still posted on the site, are accompanied by captions making light of the corpses; for example one photo of a charred body was dubbed "Cooked Iraqi."

The Army Criminal Investigation Command in Iraq conducted the preliminary inquiry within the past week but closed it after concluding no felony crime had been committed and failing to determine whether U.S. soldiers were responsible for the photos and whether they showed actual war dead, Army officials said.

Col. Joe Curtin, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, said there currently was no formal investigation into the matter.


(ring....ring....ring)
(click)
Thank you for calling the Federal Office of Officially Pretending to Give a Shit. All of our spinmeisters are currently prettending to care about other emergencies. If the mainstream media is paying attention to your problem, please press 1; if your problem primarily affects people in a red state with more than 20 electoral votes, press 2. If you contributed at least $1000 to the 2004 Bush campaign, relax; help is already on the way. If the media are so distracted by our other screwups that Joe Sixpack has no idea how bad your problem is, please hang up and call the Federal Office of LaLaLa I Can't Hear You.

Roster

Karl Rove
Bill Frist
Tom DeLay
Scooter Libby
Richard Perle
David Safavian
Jack Abramoff
update:
Dennis Hastert (a bit premature, perhaps, but worth investigation)
Tom Noe (state level, but was a cog in Bush's CREEP, so it counts)

Who am I missing? (of those who are facing criminal investigation or charges -- Bush and Cheney don't (yet) belong on that list)

C'mon lurkers, help me out here...

Another hole, another shovel

House Republicans on Wednesday will launch a rapid-fire assault against environmental protections on the pretext of helping the U.S. oil and gas industry recover from hurricane damage, environmental groups charge.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee and the House Resources Committee are holding separate meetings to finalize legislation on Wednesday, with the aim of combining them into a single energy bill for the full House to debate next week.

The resources panel, led by Richard Pombo of California, wants to lift a ban on Florida offshore drilling, promote oil shale and sell a dozen national parks for energy development.

"This really has very little to do with the hurricanes or relief efforts or even refiners. This is deregulation pure and simple," said John Walke of Natural Resources Defense Council.

Texan Joe Barton's energy committee wants to expand U.S. gasoline production by loosening federal rules that limit pollution when refineries or coal-fired power plants are expanded. U.S. gasoline supplies have tightened since hurricanes Katrina and Rita roared across the U.S. Gulf Coast, closing up to one-fourth of the nation's refining capacity.

House Republicans received a thumbs up from President George W. Bush on Monday when he said environmental rules and paperwork are obstacles holding up U.S. refinery expansions.

Bush specifically criticized the relatively obscure "new source review" rule administered by the Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Clean Air Act. It aims to protect public health by ensuring that refinery expansions do not increase acid rain and smog.

Environmentalists perked up their ears at Bush's remarks, noting that he rarely mentions the program.

"You know darn well that the president doesn't have a clue what new source review is," said Frank O'Donnell of Clean Air Watch. "It's clear that there's a coordinated effort between the White House and Congress to put key environmental protections on the chopping block."


A mere ten days ago, I said this in another context: "Applying this magnificent logic, followed resolutely and in utter defiance of cause and effect, the Secretary of State shows us again that there is no hole anywhere in the world that these chowderheads will not try to dig their way out of."

And here is another hole. Do they face the evidence of global warming presented by the destruction these hurricanes have wrought? Does our conclave of environmental sinners repent?

Bah. Silly rabbit.

An unprecedented environmental disaster is the perfect excuse to roll back environmental protections. Just as record deficits were the justification for tax cuts, and the FEMA Snafu is the perfect excuse to cede more power to the military. Just as more death and destruction in Iraq prove the absurd "flypaper" theory is correct.

A common beef against the Hollywood enviro-disaster pic "The Day After Tomorrow," in which it took a dramatic, overnight climate shift to wake up our government, was that it was unrealistic. I now see that the complaint was justified. If the movie had been accurate, the Cheney figure who ended up as President would have responded by eliminating all environmental regulations and offering subsidies to multinationals that agreed to burn old tires and used motor oil just for the hell of it.


Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Bill Clinton- 'The era of big government is over' - Jan. 27, 1996

George W. Bush- "The era of big government is back' - September 15, 2005

Tom DeLay - 'And we can do it all with your children's money' - September 14, 2005

One Shot Learning

More columny over @The Raw Story

Pssst... wanna buy a governor?

Props to folks who see ways of using the online world in new and distinctive ways. California nurses, mightily hacked off at the Governator, are selling him on eBay. Of course he's been for sale for some time; this is simply a more democratic and efficent way of soliciting bids.

Perhaps the Golden Palace will bid, and, consistent with past practice, proudly announce their purchase by tattooing Ahnold's forehead with their logo. It will likely change his behavior not one whit, but the truth in advertising wil be a major step forward in American electoral politics. Perhaps it would start a trend: I would pay to put "Big Oil" on Shrub's forehead, and "Halliburton" on the Dick's.

Update: Alas, the Gropinator's peeps obvously got to eBay and had the auction yanked. Or maybe it was the middlemen who were concerned about losing their commissions. Either way, the auction is no more, but the point was made. Bravo.

Monday, September 26, 2005

Speaking of mass-media whoring...

I watched some of Aaron Brown on CNN tonight. A short segment purported to take on the "question" of whether global warming had anything to do with the destructive power of Katrina and Rita. Arguing that there is (to a greater or lesser degree) a strong case that human activity is making these things worse were a parade of bona fide academics. Arguing to the contrary (because hey, that's what fair and balanced news is all about) was some guy (I think it was Steven Milloy) from the Cato Institute.

Now I thought Cato was about winger politics, not swimming upstream on science. So I let my fingers do the googling. And I found this brilliant summary of the way global warming "experts" including the Cato clan, have been created, bought and paid for by Exxon.

Yo, CNN... don't you think this is just a wee bit relevant to the "he said, she said" nonsense that you seem to think qualifies as journalism?

Independent media = Al Qaeda

The Guardian: Guantanamo inmate says US told him to spy on al-Jazeera

The US military told an al-Jazeera cameraman being held at Guantánamo Bay that he would be released as long as he agreed to spy on journalists at the Arabic news channel, according to documents seen by the Guardian.
The journalist has been in the prison without charge for three-and-a-half years after being accused by the US of being a terrorist, allegations he denies. He claims that he has been interrogated more than 100 times but not asked about alleged terrorist offences. Instead, Sami Muhyideen al-Hajj says US military personnel have alleged during interrogation that al-Jazeera has been infiltrated by al-Qaida and that one of its presenters is linked to Islamists.


This reminds me of the joke (I think it came from the Daily Show) about how Bush doesn't have gray matter between the ears, he has black and white matter. There are only two kinds of media as far as the Bush mafia is concerned. There is the corporate whoreocracy, which they effectively carry in their back pockets, and there is everybody else. By daring to cast this train wreck of an administration as, well, a train wreck, Al Jazeera makes itself the Enemy, interchangeable with all other elements of said Enemy. Al Jazeera, Al Qaeda, Al DiMeola, whatever.


MSM Math

Thousands.




Hundreds.



Almost the same, right?

Of course, the fair and balanced thing is to give them both equal exposure -- that is to say, virtually none.

Sunday, September 25, 2005

Weekend Wanker: Christopher Hitchens

The pleasures that come from watching total wingnuts are somewhat different than those that come from watching the much rarer birds, the tortured, conflicted souls who must somehow live with the dissonance that comes when authoritarian knee-jerkings inhabit a body that somehow also retains logic receptors.

The unadulterated whacko offers amusement, but the game becomes tiresome; taking on the occasional Alan Keyes or Pat Robertson is intellectual junk food because they offer no substance.

Watching the more intelligent conservatives try to reconcile thinking with supporting the War on Terrah and its leading practitioner is far more nutritous.

Andrew Sullivan usually entertains in his doomed quest for the spot in the Republican Party where intelligent openly gay men are accepted. And so amid his potpourri of other positions, some of which make perfect sense, you get well-argued nonsense like Sullivan’s passionate defense of the flypaper theory, or his foam-at-the-mouth reaction to Noam Chomsky on Real Time last year.

I had not spent a lot of time exposed to Hitchens’ ranting, so I was surprised to see from his appearance on Real Time that he was cut from similar cloth.

As with Sullivan, he offered a number of reasonable views and criticisms of Bush here and there. But his blind spot, as with Sully, is his absolute adherence to Bush’s insane approach to radical Islam.

Where Hitch went off the deep end was his justification for wholesale slaughter of thousands of Muslims by reference to 18th- century Muslim pirates who, according to Hitch, justified enslaving the white sailors from the ships they captured by reference to the Koran. For Hitch, it seems, that is enough to forever taint the Koran as a Holy book, and by extension all who embrace it.

OK, got that? Religion used to justify bad acts. Therefore, religion and its followers bad, and deserving of foreign occupation, torture and other benefits of our enlightened assistance.

By Hitchen's logic, of course, Catholicism is equally irredeemable (the Inquisition did not end until 1834), and our own Republic (and, by extension, the religion of its leaders) is forever benighted by its embrace of slavery, which did not end until well after the episode Hitchens rides like a remora.

Wanker.

So much for bake sales for bombers...

The Observer via Shakespeare's Sister:

An extraordinary appeal to Americans from the Bush administration for money to help pay for the reconstruction of Iraq has raised only $600 (£337), The Observer has learnt…

The public's reluctance to contribute much more than the cost of two iPods to the administration's attempt to offer citizens 'a further stake in building a free and prosperous Iraq' has been seized on by critics as evidence of growing ambivalence over that country.

Remember the Vietnam-era slogan?


Well, kids, our schools are even worse off than they were then, but I think we can now rule out bake sales for bombers, given the unwillingness of the neocons to lift a finger to support their own adventurism in Iraq.

This is amazing stuff, and deserves to be publicized far and wide.

Entergy New Orleans files for bankruptcy in wake of Katrina

via MSN Money, which is no coincidence:

NEW ORLEANS (AP) - The New Orleans subsidiary of Entergy Corporation is declaring bankruptcy.

The move by Entergy New Orleans into Chapter Eleven protection comes as it works to restore gas and power service to the city. The request for "debtor-in-possession" financing would have the parent company make up to 200 (m) million dollars in loans to the utility. It's asking that up to 150 (m) million of that loans be approved on an interim basis.


Without sorting through reams of mind-meltingly boring court filings to get to the true details, this is a bit speculative. But as I noted previously, Entergy does big business with NBC's parent GE. If Entergy uses the bankruptcy to walk away from big debts to GE, it will be interesting to see how it affects NBC's coverage.

Oh, right... corporate never dictates editorial policy. Silly me.


Saturday, September 24, 2005

Whiskey Bar: Heart of Darkness

I wrote my own Heart of Darkness a few months ago. Billmon's is better, and it is just a (long) blog post, in which he works his way through the real-world pros and cons of immediate withdrawal from Iraquagmire. His analysis is just so dead nuts.

No excerpts. Just read it.

Chance the President

MoDo mocks Dubya's flailing Rita response. She quotes his brittle defense of his field trip to Northcom.
"See, Northcom is the main entity that interfaces - that uses federal assets, federal troops, to interface with local and state government. I want to watch that relationship."


Remember "Being There?" Chance the gardner (Peter Sellers) says, "Is there a TV upstairs? I like to watch."

And many of the fools around him, seeing what they wanted to see, thought Chance a wise man, too.

Exactly

Daily Kos: I'm On the Verge of Saying Screw the Anti-War Rally

I was seriously considering heading up to the local anti-war rally today. But when I went online yestarday to find the particulars, I saw that the march was about a bunch of other issues, including issues/positions I wanted nothing to do with. So I stayed home. Others, I now see, had a similar reaction:
Watching clips of the Answer Anti-War Rally, all I see are things that I want nothing to do with. I am a staunch supporter of Israel, and its fundamental right to exist. I bet you that the majority of Americans who are against the war are too. Yet I watch this rally and see people basically supporting the Hamas, etc., and the suicide killings of innocent Israelis in cafes, on buses, etc.

If you want to break down the coalition of people against the war, turning this into a hate the Jews/Israel party is an easy way to do it. So, I suggest this: back the f--k off other issues, and concentrate on the one issue that unites us, and unites this community with the majority of the American people: The Iraq War was A Mistake, and the US should pull out as fast as possible. As a subsidiary to this: George W. Bush is responsible for the biggest foreign policy blunder (i.e. Iraq) since at least Vietnam, and should be held accountable. Going beyond this to other pet issues of the so-called far-left is going to break this coalition down and kill the common cause.


If I wanted to be funny about it, I would compare this situation to the way in Monty Python's classic "Life of Brian" the People's Judean Front is too busy squabbling with the Judean People's Front to ever get around to dealing with the Romans. But this ain't funny -- it is totally counterproductive. Which makes me think about the Spartacus Youth Leauge, a group that mucked things up at my college long ago. Though they claimed to be far-left, I always thought they were so effective at splintering, and thus neutering the rest of the leftists that they were probably CIA plants. Reading in my alumni magazine that the leader of our campus Sparts became a commodities trader after graduation did little to change my view.

So stop this shit, please. U.S. out of Iraq, period.

Score one for the blogs

The Left Coaster: Top Republican Tells Post: Laura Has Taken Away Bush's Swagger

The Left Coaster quotes herd animal WaPo, which, mirabile dictu, is following the herd now tugging at Bush's entrails:
(A) growing number of Republicans inside and out of the White House have noticed an administration less sure-footed and slower to react to the political environment surrounding them.
A top Republican close to the White House since the earliest days said the absence of a "reelection target" and pressure from first lady Laura Bush and others to soften his second-term tone conspired to temper Bush's swagger well before Katrina hit. "A reelection campaign was always the driving principle to force them to get things together," said the GOP operative, who would speak candidly about Bush only if his name was not used. He said the "brilliance of this team" was always overstated. "Part of the reason they looked so good is Democrats were so discombobulated." Since the election, this official said, White House aides reported that Laura Bush was among those counseling Bush to change his cowboy image during the final four years.
William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, said the psychological turnabout started with the failed Social Security campaign, billed as the number one domestic priority six months ago. "The negative effect of the Social Security [campaign] is underestimated," Kristol said. "Once you make that kind of mistake, people tend to be less deferential to your decisions." This coincided with a growing number of Republicans losing faith in Bush's war plan, as Republicans such as Sens. Chuck Hagel (Neb.) and Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) openly questioned the president's strategy.


When I talk with friends who do not spend large slugs of time in our corner of the blogosphere, I find myself having to explain and justify what we do. Beyond talking to ourselves, it is not always obvious what we accomplish. The WaPo won't come right out and say it, natch, but to me, this is pretty dramatic evidence that what we did made a difference.

The Bush plan to destroy Social Security required that they be given free reign to once again define black as white and have carte blanche to control the terminology and tenor of the debate. As with the invasion if Iraq, these criminals can get what they want only by using language and visuals in a giant game of 3-card monte. But this time they failed. The left hemiblogosphere was relentless in hammering the MSM every time they parroted White House talking points and used misleading or false statistics. Stars like Josh Marshall did important work in holding the feet of every individual Senator and Congressperson to the fire -- if they so much as waffled, we all knew about it, and the feedback loop was very effective in helping Harry Reid keep the Dems in Congress in line. And as the Rovians are now admitting, those small deflections started an unraveling that is spreading to everything else this cancerous cabal touches.

Individually, I am a gnat on the ass of an elephant. Together with a multitude of other pests, we are dragging down their malignant dreams of empire.

Friday, September 23, 2005

The George W. Bush National Yellow Elephant Sanctuary

Ballsy genius:

Just shoot me

The Times:Liberal star may stand to terminate Arnie's career
WARREN BEATTY is considering a challenge to Arnold Schwarzenegger for the governorship of California next year in what could be a battle of the celebrities.
Speculation over Mr Beatty’s political ambitions began after he addressed a nurses’ union on Thursday. To wild applause and chants of “run, Warren, run”, Mr Beatty, a long-time liberal campaigner, promised to campaign against Mr Schwarzenegger’s “insulting and bullying” attacks on nurses, teachers and firefighters.

Mr Schwarzenegger, 58, a Republican and naturalised American who harnessed his Hollywood star appeal to win a “recall election ” victory two years ago, recently said that he would run again for the governorship. Polls show the one-time Mr Universe’s popularity’s to be dwindling, though the Austrian-born Mr Schwarzenegger still hopes to change the constitution so that he may one day be able to run for the White House.

Mr Beatty, 68, has been involved in politics since 1968, when he campaigned with Robert Kennedy, who was assassinated that year. He also supported Senator George McGovern.
...
On Thursday Mr Beatty attacked the proposals of Mr Schwarzenegger to limit state spending and reduce the power of Democrats in the legislature. The proposals have encountered entrenched opposition, forcing the Governor to take the measures directly to voters with a special election in November.

Mr Schwarzenegger believes that his celebrity power will overwhelm the electorate. The involvement of Mr Beatty, however, could change that.

Government is not showbusiness,” said Mr Beatty, as delegates of the union convention repeatedly interrupted him with standing ovations.

And yet in next year's race for governor, the good people of California -- all eight of us -- could be faced with a choice between a has-been actor with a history of womanizing and no relevant experience on the one hand, and Arnold on the other.

This is just wonderful.

I went into hiding from my 49-state friends when the Gropinator became my governor. I consoled myself with the knowledge that I had voted against every actor* I could. Now what?

*(A long time ago, Robert Klein had a talk show. Huntz Hall was once a guest. Klein brought up the fact that a young Ronald Reagan had appeared in a "Bowery Boys" short. Klein asked him if he had ever imagined that Reagan would ever become President. Hall replied, "Are you kidding? I never imagined that he would ever become an actor.")

From what I little know, I like a lot of Beatty's politics. But somehow I just don't see how the best response to the opinion of the rest of the country that we in California really are star-struck, shallow fools is to prove them right. Again.

I'm ready for my close-up, Mr. DeMille.

"Christian" School expels student for having two moms

via Americablog:
A 14-year-old student was expelled from a Christian school because her parents are lesbians, the school's superintendent said in a letter.

Shay Clark was expelled from Ontario Christian School on Thursday.

"Your family does not meet the policies of admission," Superintendent Leonard Stob wrote to Tina Clark, the girl's biological mother.
Please make sure you are sitting down, because Mr. Bluememe is about to quote Scripture:

Do not hold against us the sins of the fathers;
may your mercy come quickly to meet us,
for we are in desperate need. Psalm 79:8.

Yet he did not put their sons to death, but acted in accordance with what is written in the Law, in the Book of Moses, where the LORD commanded: "Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sins." 2 Chronicles 25:4.



But what do I know. I'm just a poor Pastafarian.

How Convenient

..as the Church Lady used to say.

The good Doctor Bloor reports that Dr. Lester Crawford, who took the reins at the FDA as a spring chicken of (depending on when his birthday falls) 66 or 67 years young a mere three months ago, is retiring because "it is time at the age of 67 to step aside."

He also informs us that Senate Majority Leader and admitted cat vivisectionist Dr. Bill Frist is blinking into the SEC's klieg lights over a recent Martha Stewart-ish stock sale. As reported elsewhere, Dr. Frist's sold his Hospital Corporation of America stock, which was worth perhaps $5 to $25 million, and which he had presumably held since his father founded the company in 1968. The reason he suddenly sold? No, not the looming announcement of poor results, which sent the stock skidding, and which, utterly by coincidence, was announced less than two weeks after the sale. As Frist's spokesperson explained, ''To avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest, Senator Frist went beyond what ethics requires and sold the stock."

Since both men are doctors, and the Hypocritical Hippocratic Oath is commonly understood (though as it turns out, not in so many words) to require that physicians "first do no harm," logic compels us to conclude that it is the view of Republican doctors that lying through your ass does no harm. Which, when you think about it, explains a great deal.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

ACLU sues Homeland Security for arresting, spying on vegans who protested ham

via Raw Story:

The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a federal lawsuit in Atlanta on behalf of two vegan protesters who were subjected to imprisonment, arrest and harassment by Homeland Security officials, RAW STORY has learned.

The lawsuit stems from a Dec. 2003 incident, when vegans Caitlin Childs and Christopher Freeman were protesting on public property outside a Honey Baked Ham store in Georgia's DeKalb County.

After the protest, the duo noticed they were being watched and photographed by a man in an unmarked car. They approached the car and wrote down the make, model, color and license plate number on a piece of paper. They then noticed the unmarked car was following them.

According to the ACLU suit, the car contained both a uniformed police officer and an undercover detective, later identified as Homeland Security Detective D.A. Gorman. The two pulled in behind Childs and Freeman and ordered them to exit their car.

Gorman then demanded that she turn over the piece of paper on which she had copied his license tag number. Childs refused to hand the paper over, and was handcuffed.

She was searched a male officer, despite her request to be searched only by a female officer, the ACLU says.

Both Childs and Freeman were arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. Police confiscated the piece of paper and Childs' house keys. Both were released from custody, but neither the piece of paper nor the keys were returned. The county has not pursued a criminal case.


Sure, all you commie symps think there is something wrong here. But perhaps you have forgotten... Hitler was a vegetarian. Nothing more need be said.

Be who we want (the party) to be

Shakespeare's Sister led me to this wisdom from a comment on the driftglass blog:
I'm just as critical as anyone else who complains that the Democratic Party hasn't done enough to distinguish itself from the Republicans, by and large.

This presents a number of options:

1) Despair that both parties suck and give up.
2) Despair that both parties suck, but since one sucks marginally less than the other, support it.
3) Despair that both parties suck and try to start a third party.
4) Wait until, by act of Divine Grace, some messianic candidate will appear who will fix things.
5) Work with others who feel as you do to gain control over one of the parties.

Since I started paying attention, in the mid-seventies, progressives have mostly been bouncing back and forth between choices 1, 2, 3 and 4.... while the right-wingers chose Door Number 5.

Here's the thing about these options, respectively:

1) Giving up means that your opponent has won. Not an option, given our opponent.

2) This works fine, assuming can resign yourself to electing people who suck marginally more or less than one another.

3) This is doomed to failure for a number of reasons. In a winner-take-all system, third party candidates are spoilers at best. And the voting reforms needed to change the winner-take-all nature of national politics won't happen: The bloated, inertial bodies of the Democratic & Republican party will stand together in concert to impede the way of the establishment of any 'progressive' party.

4) Messiahs get crucified. (c.f. The Dean Scream, Gary Hart, RFK, and an endless array of others ) If we’re to take our country back, it isn’t going to be because some great political giant will come along and make the Bad Men Go Away: if there isn’t sufficient ground work, even a giant can be brought down by an army of Lilliputians. To effect political change, you need a bunch of people who can give air cover and ground support to even the most exemplary of leaders. Especially them.

5) This is the strategy that worked for the right-wing loonies who blight our nation... back when they found themselves in a similar fix to the one we're in now. The media was against them. They didn't have the presidency, the house or the senate. For them, 1964 was like our 2004. You know how crazy the media made Dean seem to the Man in the Street? That was Barry Goldwater 40 years ago: "In your guts, you know he's nuts". So what did they do? They took the long view and decided that a Republican Party without much going for it was the perfect Host Organism for them. Why start from scratch when there's an organization with a national presence that one can take control of?

If I'm reading driftglass right, he's saying that if you don't like these Democrats, then it's time to raise us up a whole new crop. But to do that, we have to plant seeds, water them, fertilize them, and not just stand around waiting to see if this year the crops look better than the field we left fallow last year.

On a personal level, because I don't like a whole lot of the Democrats we've got now, I'm trying to become the kind of Democrat I want to see more of. It's an inside job.

I think we’ve got to look to each other, starting on the local level, in our communities... to build a political climate in which we rise up through the ranks... supporting each other with time and money... and increasingly occupy positions of influence and authority in order to institute the changes we desire and desperately need.

If you think that'll take time, you're absolutely right. There's no time to waste.

But if anyone has got a better alternative, I'd love to hear the plan.


In a sense, we who blog have started this process. We congratulate ourselves for our successes, but they are small and isolated at this point. Blogging is still kind of hermetic and elitist. Taking over the party is, unfortunately, neither of those things.

Somehow, we need to get from here to there. And maybe the way to do it is at really is at the schoolboard and city council level, just like the wingnuts did it.

Eloquence... and the opposite

MoDo vents in her latest piece, "Message: I Can't":

There's nothing more pathetic than watching someone who's out of touch feign being in touch. On his fifth sodden pilgrimage of penitence to the devastation he took so long to comprehend, W. desperately tried to show concern. He said he had spent some "quality time" at a Chevron plant in Pascagoula and nattered about trash removal, infrastructure assessment teams and the "can-do spirit."

"We look forward to hearing your vision so we can more better do our job," he said at a briefing in Gulfport, Miss., urging local officials to "think bold," while they still need to think mold.

"Sodden pilgrimage of penitance." Wow. A lot more better than.... oh, screw it.

Sure, sure. the ability to put together sentences is not at the top of the list of qualifications for President for most people. But Shrub's language deficit isn't an outlier -- it is a damned good predictor of his incompetence in pretty much every other sphere.

America, we can do more better.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Billmon: Appeasing North Korea

A few days ago, in an improvident and uninformed moment, I actually gave the Bushies credit for progress on the North Korean situation. Billmon knows better, and explains what a hypocritical mess they made of this one, too.

Serves me right.

Maybe NOLA isn't the only thing that isn't dry anymore...

Here's a lede you would've never expected to see on bluememe: Check out this story over at the National Enquirer:

Faced with the biggest crisis of his political life, President Bush has hit the bottle again, The National Enquirer can reveal.

Bush, who said he quit drinking the morning after his 40th birthday, has started boozing amid the Katrina catastrophe.

Family sources have told how the 59-year-old president was caught by First Lady Laura downing a shot of booze at their family ranch in Crawford, Texas, when he learned of the hurricane disaster.

His worried wife yelled at him: "Stop, George."

Following the shocking incident, disclosed here for the first time, Laura privately warned her husband against "falling off the wagon" and vowed to travel with him more often so that she can keep an eye on Dubya, the sources add.

"When the levees broke in New Orleans, it apparently made him reach for a shot," said one insider. "He poured himself a Texas-sized shot of straight whiskey and tossed it back. The First Lady was shocked and shouted: "Stop George!"

"Laura gave him an ultimatum before, 'It's Jim Beam or me.' She doesn't want to replay that nightmare — especially now when it's such tough going for her husband."

Bush is under the worst pressure of his two terms in office and his popularity is near an all-time low. The handling of the Katrina crisis and troop losses in Iraq have fueled public discontent and pushed Bush back to drink.

A Washington source said: "The sad fact is that he has been sneaking drinks for weeks now. Laura may have only just caught him — but the word is his drinking has been going on for a while in the capital. He's been in a pressure cooker for months.

"The war in Iraq, the loss of American lives, has deeply affected him. He takes every soldier's life personally. It has left him emotionally drained.

The result is he's taking drinks here and there, likely in private, to cope. "And now with the worst domestic crisis in his administration over Katrina, you pray his drinking doesn't go out of control."

This is some seriously scary shit. But I am skeptical. I don't believe for a minute that "He takes every soldier's life personally."

The article quotes Dr. Justin "Bush on the Couch" Frank, who does think Bush may be drinking again. But if the folks at the Enquirer had actually read the book, they'd know that there's no way the emotionally crippled Bush is capable of the kind of empathy that feeling the suffering of others requires.

He may indeed have reverted to being a wet drunk, but the cause is related to the suffering of others only because they reflect back on him and raise the temerature in his own personal stewpot.

Immune Response?

SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) - Valero Energy Corp. Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Greehey said Hurricane Rita's impact on U.S. crude oil production and refining could be a "national disaster."

"If it hits the refineries, and we're short refining capacity, you're going to see gasoline prices well over $3.00 a gallon at the pump," Greehey said in a Tuesday night interview.

Valero became the largest U.S. refiner earlier this year when it completed the purchase of Premcor Inc. Valero operates refineries in Port Arthur, Houston, Texas City and Corpus Christi, Texas -- all potentially in the path of Hurricane Rita.

"It's going to be coming across the (U.S.) Gulf (of Mexico)," Greehey said. "There's a lot of oil platforms, oil rigs, (natural) gas platforms, gas rigs. It could have a significant impact on supply and prices, and then, depending on what it does to the refineries, there are still four refineries that are shut down. So this really is a national disaster."


Remember the Gaia hypothesis?
Courtesy Wiki:
Gaia theory today is a spectrum of hypotheses, ranging from the undeniable (Weak Gaia) to the radical (Strong Gaia).

At one end is the undeniable statement that the organisms on the Earth have radically altered its composition. A stronger position is that the Earth's biosphere effectively acts as if it is a self-organizing system, which works in such a way as to keep its systems in some kind of meta-equilibrium that is broadly conducive to life.


If you accept that global warming is (a) real, (b) caused and/or exacerbated by the burning of fossil fuels, and (c) highly destabilizing to the system, then a series of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes aimed at our oil infrastructure seem to suggest a remarkably evolved and sophisticated immune response trying to rid the global organism of a pathogen.

Now that's a version of "intelligent design" I can get behind.

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Adventures in Poll Shitting


The Mystery Pollster crunches Dubya's tanking numbers. Katrina is not his biggest problem. "Strong and Decisive Leader" is the number the insiders seem to care about, and it was heading south before, though it has gotten bunches worse after Katrina:
Heh.

The coining of a new oxymoron

The Texans-only scramble to win the George W. Bush Presidential Library surged into high gear on the eve of today's deadline as Arlington and six other contenders bid for a prize laden with international prestige and hundreds of millions of dollars in economic benefits.

George W. Bush Presidential Library? Let's see... a basement filled with millions of classified documents no one will ever be allowed to see; Karl Rove's first edition of Machiavelli's "The Prince;" an urn containing the ashes of the Bill of Rights; and 100 declassified copies of the only book Shrub was ever seen actually reading, though it is a mystery why scholars would venture to Texas to thumb through "My Pet Goat."

Alaska to Katrina victims: Drop Dead

You probably recall how the recent federal highway bill/pork-fest contained gajillions of ridiculous pet projects, the wors of which were a cope of bridges to nowhere in Alaska. Does Alaska's Congressman Don Young have any compassion for the victims of the worst disaster on U.S. soil in generations?

"'They can kiss my ear!' Young boomed when Sam Bishop, Washington correspondent for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, asked him about the many pleas to redirect the bridge money.

'That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard,' Young went on, noting that Louisiana did quite well in his highway bill.

And, the congressman said, he helped the seafood industry donate more than $500,000 for hurricane victims. (That was at the 'Seafood Invitational,' a charity golf tournament Sept. 9 in Roslyn, Wash., Bishop reported Friday.)

'I raised enough money to give back to them voluntarily,' he said, 'and that's it!' "


Mr. Young appears to have forgotten the Alaska Earthquake of 1964, which registered somewhere between an 8.6 and a 9.2, caused a tsunami, and would have caused major damage and a killed lots of people if more than a few hardy souls lived there back then.

We'll be sure to remember your generosity, though. Dick.

Groundhog Day

US military planners are considering extended tours of duty for some units in Iraq if more US troops are needed for the upcoming elections there, a Pentagon spokesman said Monday.

Lawrence DiRita, the defense department's chief spokesman, said it was "entirely possible" commanders would want to boost the force in Iraq beyond its current level of 140,000.

"And I guess the thinking at the moment is, if we did need more and it was based on rotations, how would that work?" he said.

"And what would the impact be on units that might wind up getting extended a week or two beyond their one year?"

DiRita denied, however, that the reassessment of force levels was prompted by a surge in suicide bombings that have killed more than 200 civilians in Iraq over the past week.

"That's not a good way to determine how good or bad things are, by how many things are exploding," he told reporters.


Actually, Larry, most of us think that is an excellent measure. It certainly seemed to be the metric that Dear Leader wanted to use after a number of buildings and airplanes exploded on our soil four years ago. And I expect that the folks in Baghdad (you know, the ones O'Lielly worries can't get a cup of coffee) would validate that indicator as well.

Fact is, there seems to be an all-you-can-eat soup and IED bar over there, and Iraq is going to continue to need more troops than we have right up until the time when our military just plain breaks under the strain. In just a few months, extending tours with stop-loss orders is going to stop working. Then you are going to find that there is no artifice that will stop the losses.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Thinktankular!

Liberal blogging and columning are thankless tasks. Not so thankless as appearing in staged photo ops in destroyed cities, perhaps, but thankless, nonetheless. It is rare that even exemplary left-of-center work (not that I claim such status for my own scribblings, mind you) receives the encomiums of the established intelligentsia, let alone the imprimatur of a major think tank. So I am fairly bursting with pride with the news that my humble efforts have been recognized and rewarded.

Say hello to the newest Senior Recidivist at the Poor Man Institute for Freedom and Democracy and a Pony.

Mainstream media, please give me a few days to complete the paperwork with our in-house attorneys and publicists before rushing to book me on talk shows, panels, etc.

And because I know that with such notoriety will inevitably come the temptation to compromise my integrity, let me assure one and all that I am no Armstrong Williams. My opinions are not for sale. My forehead, on the other hand, is accepting bids.

Bottom looks like up

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush's vow to rebuild the Gulf Coast did little to help his standing with the public, only 40 percent of whom now approve of his performance in office, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

Just 41 percent of the 818 adults polled between Friday and Monday said they approved of Bush's handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, while 57 percent disapproved.

And support for his management of the war in Iraq has dropped to 32 percent, with 67 percent telling pollsters they disapproved of how Bush is prosecuting the conflict.

Holy boat anchor, Batman. I had no idea these numbers could, uh, take on water so fast.

Perhaps this will help turn things around:
David Safavian, who oversees $300 billion of annual federal purchasing as director of the Office of Procurement Policy, has been arrested for three criminal charges relating to obstruction of a federal investigation. He resigned quietly last Friday.

RAW STORY previously reported that ex-gambling lobbyist Safavian had, "quietly advanced the interests of former clients under the cloak of a vocally anti-gambling Utah congressman" Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT). Safavian was Cannon's chief of staff.

The indictment refers to a 2002 trip arranged by Jack Abramoff, a Washington power lobbyist who arranged a trip to Scotland that took powerful House Rep. Bob Ney golfing. Abramoff was joined on the trip by former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed and David Safavian. According to the charges, Safavian "allegedly aided a Washington, D.C., lobbyist in the lobbyist's attempts to acquire GSA-controlled property in and around Washington, D.C."


OK, maybe not. But have no fear, Bush stalwarts. There's always the Fitzgerald investigation, and the possibility that Tom Delay will follow Abramoff to the big house. And Rita.

And the chance, if we are all really lucky, to see your man in some new fall colors:




Kunstler out-pessimisms me

All kinds of assumptions about the okay-ness of our recent collective behavior are headed out the window. This naturally beats a straight path to politics, since that is the theater in which our collective choices are dramatized. It really won't take another jolting event like a major hurricane or a terror incident or an H4N5 flu outbreak to take things over the edge -- though it is very likely that something else will happen. George W. Bush, and the party he represents, are headed into full Hooverization mode. After Katrina, nobody will take claims of governmental competence seriously.

The new assumption will be that when shit happens you are on your own. In this remarkable three weeks since New Orleans was shredded, no Democrat has stepped into the vacuum of leadership, either, with a different vision of what we might do now, and who we might become. This is the kind of medium that political maniacs spawn in. Something is out there right now, feeding on the astonishment and grievance of a whipsawed middle class, and it will have a lot more nourishment in the months ahead.

Can you think of anything to counter him with that doesn't sound like it comes from the soundtrack to "Annie"?

The devil's due

N.Korea accord reached, but so far just words

BEIJING (Reuters) - North Korea promised to give up its nuclear weapons program on Monday, defusing a high-stakes crisis, but skeptics said the deal hammered out in Beijing was long on words and short of action.

South Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia and China -- the other players in the six-party talks -- in exchange expressed a willingness to provide oil, energy aid and security guarantees.

Washington and Tokyo agreed to normalize ties with the impoverished and diplomatically isolated North, which pledged to rejoin the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

"The joint statement is the most important achievement in the two years since the start of six-party talks," Chinese chief negotiator Wu Dawei said. The seven-day session ended with a standing ovation by all delegates.

South Korea's unification minister, Chung Dong-young, went further, saying the agreement would serve as a first step toward dismantling the Cold War confrontation between the two Koreas.


I am as grudging in my acknowledgement of achievements by Team Bush as anyone. And everyone seems to be properly cautious in evaluating the latest news here. But even I have to admit that this development sounds like it is both important and genuine progress.

From chattel to cattle

Washington, DC — FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford has appointed a man who has spent the majority of his career in the office of veterinary medicine to the position of acting director of the Office of Women's Health at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dr. Norris Alderson will replace Dr. Susan Wood, a key women's health expert, who resigned on August 31 in protest of the FDA's handling of the application to make Plan B emergency contraception (EC) available over the counter.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America Interim President Karen Pearl issued these comments on the appointment:

"The appointment of Dr. Norris Alderson, a man who has spent the majority of his career in the office of veterinary medicine, to the position of acting director of the FDA's Office of Women's Health speaks volumes about the priority the Bush administration places on women's health and safety. The appointment of Dr. Alderson to replace Dr. Susan Wood further undermines the shaky credibility of an agency that has allowed politics to trump sound science, medical evidence, and women's health.



Stories like this just beg the question: do they make tone-deaf moves like this because they are stupid, or out of malice?

Sunday, September 18, 2005

Billmon: the new fragging

Billmon surveys the latest on that other disaster:
You may recall that in early August six Marine snipers were ambushed and wiped out in Anbar province, near the insurgent-infested city of Haditha. It was a humiliating blow -- Marine snipers are supposed to hunt, not be hunted -- although it was quickly overshadowed by an even bigger humiliation when 14 Marines riding in an antiquated amphibious vehicle (in the middle of the desert!) were blown up in the same neighborhood.

But the destruction of those Marine sniper teams may have been even more ominous than it appeared at the time. Military analyst William Lind, who has excellent sources inside the Corps, says he's been told that the snipers were attacked and killed by the Iraqi unit they were attached to.

Lind also says he's not been able to confirm that report. But if it's true -- or if other Marines even think its true -- the implications for Iraqification are stark. How do you "stand up" an Army when you can't risk turning your back on the troops once they stand up?


One of the many signs the Vietnam mission was doomed was the practice of fragging. This 21st century version is even scarier, because it is impersonal, and will go a long way all by itself toward dooming the Iraqization effort.


Is Bill Clinton the only Dem who can make it simple?

Clinton launches withering attack on Bush on Iraq, Katrina, budget - Yahoo! News

On the US budget, Clinton warned that the federal deficit may be coming untenable, driven by foreign wars, the post-hurricane recovery programme and tax cuts that benefitted just the richest one percent of the US population, himself included.

"What Americans need to understand is that ... every single day of the year, our government goes into the market and borrows money from other countries to finance Iraq, Afghanistan, Katrina, and our tax cuts," he said.

"We have never done this before. Never in the history of our republic have we ever financed a conflict, military conflict, by borrowing money from somewhere else."

Clinton added: "We depend on Japan, China, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, and Korea primarily to basically loan us money every day of the year to cover my tax cut and these conflicts and Katrina. I don't think it makes any sense."


There it is -- a simple, easy to understand explanation of what even red-state America will agree is a Bad Thing the Bush Administration is doing and will neither admit nor fix.

Mrs. Bluememe was mightily impressed with the intellectual horsepower John Roberts displayed last week. Roberts is indeed as intelligent as he is evasive. But the erudite 3-card monty that worked before the Judiciary Committee would never fly with the general public from a politician. Not that evasiveness is a fatal flaw; it is more like a prerequisite. But Roberts sounded like he was the smartest guy in the room, and more Bubbas remember beating that kid up in school than being him. Which only brought into stark relief the feats regularly accomplished by Slick Willie.

Dumb can only sound dumb; no matter how well his speeches are written, Dubya's native dullness overwhelms them. Smart would seem to have more options, but, to the less-educated ear, usually sounds standoffishly smart; John Kerry's elliptical, convoluted sentences didn't just confuse Bubba, they pissed him off.

Accessible smart seems to be the Holy Grail of politics; it is a combination that has eluded everybody but Bill Clinton. He really is the smartest guy in the room, but his easy, plainspoken style puts Bubba at ease. He is the Raymond Carver of politics: he crafts exquisite, nuanced prose that sounds like ordinary folks talking.

Clinton brought his high heat in his speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention, which reminded me (and everybody else) how good he was, and how far short Kerry fell. He did it again today. His politics are too centrist and, I guess, too realistic for me. But the Democratic Party needs to take talking points lessons from him, and soon. If they can't argue persuasively in language Joe Sixpack can grok, nothing else they do will much matter.

Fareed Zakaria nails it

Leaders Who Won't Choose
Whatever his other accomplishments, Bush will go down in history as the most fiscally irresponsible chief executive in American history. Since 2001, government spending has gone up from $1.86 trillion to $2.48 trillion, a 33 percent rise in four years! Defense and Homeland Security are not the only culprits. Domestic spending is actually up 36 percent in the same period. These figures come from the libertarian Cato Institute's excellent report "The Grand Old Spending Party," which explains that "throughout the past 40 years, most presidents have cut or restrained lower-priority spending to make room for higher-priority spending. What is driving George W. Bush's budget bloat is a reversal of that trend." To govern is to choose. And Bush has decided not to choose. He wants guns and butter and tax cuts.

People wonder whether we can afford Iraq and Katrina. The answer is, easily. What we can't afford simultaneously is $1.4 trillion in tax cuts and more than $1 trillion in new entitlement spending over the next 10 years. To take one example, if Congress did not make permanent just one of its tax cuts, the repeal of estate taxes, it would generate $290 billion over the next decade. That itself pays for most of Katrina and Iraq.

Robert Hormats of Goldman Sachs has pointed out that previous presidents acted differently. During World War II, Franklin Roosevelt cut nonwar spending by more than 20 percent, in addition to raising taxes to finance the war effort. During the Korean War, President Truman cut non-defense spending 28 percent and raised taxes to pay the bills. In both cases these presidents were often slashing cherished New Deal programs that they had created. The only period—other than the current one—when the United States avoided hard choices was Vietnam: spending increased on all fronts. The results eventually were deficits, high interest rates and low growth—stagflation.
...
Today's Republicans believe in pork, but they don't believe in government. So we have the largest government in history but one that is weak and dysfunctional. Public spending is a cynical game of buying votes or campaign contributions, an utterly corrupt process run by lobbyists and special interests with no concern for the national interest. So we shovel out billions on "Homeland Security" to stave off nonexistent threats to Wisconsin, Wyoming and Montana while New York and Los Angeles remain unprotected. We mismanage crises with a crazy-quilt patchwork of federal, local and state authorities—and sing paeans to federalism to explain our incompetence. We denounce sensible leadership and pragmatism because they mean compromise and loss of ideological purity. Better to be right than to get Iraq right.


Keep digging, fools

Thirty-five percent (35%) of Americans now say that President Bush has done a good or excellent job responding to Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. That's down from 39% before his speech from New Orleans.

The latest Rasmussen Reports survey shows that 41% give the President poor marks for handling the crisis, that's up 37% before the speech.

Fifty percent (50%) of Americans favor the main proposal from that speech--a federal commitment of $200 billion to help rebuild New Orleans. Twenty-seven percent (27%) are opposed and 23% are not sure.

The spending plan has not been well received by conservative voters--just 43% favor the huge federal commitment partisan while 37% are opposed. This is especially striking given how supportive the President's base has remained throughout his Administration.


Conservatives are gagging on the cost. The rest of us are sure the money is just another blank check to Bush's cronies. Does anybody believe any of this is going to translate into real changes for the victims? On the ground, no. Among the punditocracy? Of course.

I watched a bit of Tweety's Sunday show today for the first time, and was dumbstruck at the spinning/shilling for our free-spending fool of a president. Will they continue to try to prop up his sorry ass even as the public continues to vote the other way?

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Puh-leze

Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | Blair attacks BBC for 'anti-US bias'
Tony Blair has denounced the BBC's coverage of Hurricane Katrina as 'full of hatred of America' and 'gloating' at the country's plight, it was reported yesterday.

Blair allegedly made the remarks privately to Rupert Murdoch, chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, which owns the rival Sky News.
...
Murdoch, a long-standing critic of the BBC, was addressing the Clinton Global Initiative conference in New York. Chuckling, he said: 'I probably shouldn't be telling you this' before recounting a recent conversation with Blair. He said the Prime Minister was in New Delhi when he criticised BBC coverage of the catastrophe in New Orleans: 'He said it was just full of hatred of America and gloating at our troubles.'

Bill Clinton, the former US President who was hosting the conference, also attacked the tone of the BBC coverage at a seminar on the media. He said it had been 'stacked up' to criticise the federal government's slow response.


Even if you assume for the sake of argument that the Bebe shaded things a bit to the harsh side (a charge I utterly reject -- like Truman said, they told the truth and the Bushies thought it was hell), the press could annouce that Dubya has carnal relations with ferrets -- and repeat it every day for a month -- and it still wouldn't balance out the sycophantic shilling our own press has churned out for the last five years.

You moron

The Raw Story Rice says she 'listens' to al Qaeda like she read Marx; Says Bin Laden just 'single person'

The Condiliar is nothing if not persistent. No Administration argument, no matter how discredited, is ever written off. From her discussion about Al Qaeda in the next Newsweek:
(W)hat fuels their movement is a clash, from their point of view, of civilization as we see it with the civilization that they wanted to build. What they do see, interestingly, is that Iraq is a central battle in that clash, which tells me that we’re exactly right that Iraq has to be won in that sense.

The mastodon in the room -- the fact that bin Laden and his followers did not give a rat's ass about Iraq until we invaded it -- must never, ever be acknowledged. Self-fulfilling prophesy is still prophesy fulfilled. But as the U.S. body count closes in on 2000, and the insurgency shows no sign of running out of throes, it is worth taking a hard look at the "flypaper" metaphor and asking asking exactly who is looking more like the fly at this point.

Applying this magnificent logic, followed resolutely and in utter defiance of cause and effect, the Secretary of State shows us again that there is no hole anywhere in the world that these chowderheads will not try to dig their way out of.

Oh, and by the way, nice shoes.

Failing Grades

from Think Progress via Skippy.

The 9/11 Commission gives Shrub his report card:



If the Commission is expecting a productive parent-teacher conference, they are going to be very disappointed.

Shell Game

The Cunning Realist sees where the economy is going, and doesn't like it one bit.

Friday, September 16, 2005

Duh

Lawyer was fired after Rove called

AUSTIN – White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove personally called the Texas secretary of state about a newspaper story quoting a staff lawyer about whether Mr. Rove was eligible to vote in the state.

The lawyer was subsequently fired.

Secretary of State Roger Williams said that he decided to dismiss the lawyer after talking with Mr. Rove but that the White House adviser didn't request that he do so.

"Absolutely not," said Mr. Williams, a longtime supporter of President Bush and a major GOP fundraiser.


Well of course Rove had her whacked. What good is it being being Beelzebub of you can't smite your enemies from time to time?

Surprise, surprise, surprise

WASHINGTON - President Bush on Friday ruled out raising taxes to pay for Gulf Coast reconstruction, saying other government spending must be cut. "You bet it will cost money, but I'm confident we can handle it," he said. Bush spoke after his advisers warned that Hurricane Katrina relief and reconstruction costs will swell the national debt by $200 billion or beyond. "It's going to cost whatever it costs," he said. "We're going to be wise about the money we spend."


If only the draconian new bankruptcy laws about to go into effect could be applied to our dry drunk-in-chief's spending binges. The bastard flat-out refuses to pay for his quagmire. He refuses to pay for his gallows-conversion, Gulf Coast Great Society crony giveaway. The only meaningful differences at this point between Dubya and Lyndon Johnson are the disparities in intelligence and motives. The results, on both human and macroeconomic levels, are getting tough to distinguish.

Is there a rule written down somewhere that says that Presidents from Texas have to screw up this way?

The 49th President?

Son of Florida Gov. Bush Arrested
AUSTIN, Texas - The youngest son of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was arrested early Friday and charged with public intoxication and resisting arrest, law enforcement officials said.

John Ellis Bush, 21, was arrested by agents of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission at 2:30 a.m. on a corner of Austin's Sixth Street bar district, said commission spokesman Roger Wade.

The nephew of President Bush was released on $2,500 bond for the resisting arrest charge, and on a personal recognizance bond for the public intoxication charge, officials said.

Wade said he had no further details about the charges.

Gov. Bush and his wife Columba appeared Friday evening at a museum reception in Miami.

"My son's doing fine. It's a private matter. We will support him. We're sad for him. But I'm not going to discuss it on the public square with 30 cameras," the governor told reporters.

It's not the first time Florida's first family has experienced legal problems with one of their children.

Noelle Bush, the governor's daughter, was arrested in January 2002 and accused of trying to pass a fraudulent prescription at a pharmacy to obtain the anti-anxiety drug Xanax. She completed a drug rehabilitation program in August 2003 and a judge dismissed the drug charges against her.

I have always thought that Jebbie is too much of a straight arrow to be the next in the dynasty to follow in Dubya's weaving footsteps. But this boy sure looks like he is hewn from the same timber as our man George, eh?

Oh, and it sure is fun to see the Jebster solemnly invoking his "private matter" schtick again. Druggy daughter? Private. Drunk & disorderly son? Private. End of life for a brain-dead woman? Center ring at Barnum and Bailey's.

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Nonsense

As Armando points out @ Daily Kos, the whole hearing charade is fundamentally absurd. Senator Feingold asked the cut-to-the-chase question:
We know where all eight other members of the court stand on these opinions -- in their opinions. They either wrote or joined one of them. Yet all eight of them will hear the next case that raises similar issues. No one is suggesting that their independence or impartiality in the next case has been compromised. . . . So I guess I want to know, why are you different? . . .[W]hy shouldn't the public have some idea of where you stand today on these crucial questions . . .? They know a great deal about how each of the other justices approach these issues. Why is your situation different?


As skilled a prevaricator as Roberts is, his answer is, frankly, garbage:

[I am] sitting here as a nominee before the court. And the great danger, of course, that I believe every one of the justices has been vigilant to safeguard against is turning this into a bargaining process. It is not a process under which senators get to say, I want you to rule this way, this way and this way. And if you tell me you'll rule this way, this way and this way, I'll vote for you. That's not a bargaining process. Judges are not politicians. They cannot promise to do certain things in exchange for votes.


The real answer here is painfully obvious. There is a pro-executive branch bias built into the system as they run it, and Roberts and his sponsors like it that way. The President's team is likely to have far more information than the Senators (and the rest of us) have. I don't believe for a second that nobody in the White House asked these kinds of questions of Roberts before naming him. If his nomination was based on competence alone, it would be an outlier, to put it mildly. This Administration has never run that way before, so why would it start now?

Asserting the "Ginsburg precedent" is effectively the same as asserting executive privilege. It is just another form of power these clowns want to further concentrate in the hands of the king -- the very thing the Founders were most anxious to guard against.

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Deja vu all over again

U.S. Deploys Slide Show to Press Case Against Iran
UNITED NATIONS, Sept. 13 -- With an hour-long slide show that blends satellite imagery with disquieting assumptions about Iran's nuclear energy program, Bush administration officials have been trying to convince allies that Tehran is on a fast track toward nuclear weapons.

The PowerPoint briefing, titled "A History of Concealment and Deception," has been presented to diplomats from more than a dozen countries. Several diplomats said the presentation, intended to win allies for increasing pressure on the Iranian government, dismisses ambiguities in the evidence about Iran's intentions and omits alternative explanations under debate among intelligence analysts.

The presenters argue that the evidence leads solidly to a conclusion that Iran's nuclear program is aimed at producing weapons, according to diplomats who have attended the briefings and U.S. officials who helped to assemble the slide show. But even U.S. intelligence estimates acknowledge that other possibilities are plausible, though unverified.


This time, I think we should take them seriously. I mean, they wouldn't lie again, would they? And after those exhaustive, soul-searching independent investigations, I'm sure they have learned some valuable lessons.

In case you thought FEMA was done fucking up


Attytood: This man almost died because of Bush's FEMA

Read the full post. This is why the "blame game" dodge is so criminally wrong. And why reporters need to be on the scene.

Game Over

The Plaid Adder nails it.
Blaming is what you do when you have to explain why you showed up late to work. It's what happens when your mother finds the broken lamp and wants to know who was playing ball in the house. You blame people for not using their turn signals properly, or for causing the toilet to back up, or for dumping you for someone else. You blame people for something that you suspect you might have responsibility for; or for something that is a mildly annoying minor problem. You can't even say 'blame game' without sounding like a child. "Blame game, blame game, let's play the blame game! La la la la la la!"

This is not a game. The dead do not come back. Suffering cannot be undone. There are no do-overs.

This is not a game. It is a crime. So I do not blame.

I accuse.


Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Qualifications

"Ginsburg Rule" incoherence

I'm watching Roberts dance around Feinstein, and he keeps ducking questions he ought to be answering. And one of his moves is to distinguish himself from Justice Ginsburg, who despite her recent adoption by Orrin Hatch and his merry band, made her opinions on the right to choose and related issues quite clear. Roberts keeps saying that the fact that Ginsburg had written on the issue prior to her nomination to the Supremes in effect allowed her to be more forthcoming before the Judicary Committee.

In other words: if your views are already known, you can tell the country what your views are. The less you have revealed, the less you have to reveal. Or, to put it another way, the less we know, the less we are entitled to know.

Makes perfect sense when you are talking about classified material related to national security. For lifetime appointment to the second most powerful chair in the United States? Not so much.

Would someone please call him on this? And while you're at it, ask him about his conversations on these issues with Bush and his guys. Anybody think they didn't ask (and demand answers to) the very kinds of questions he is avoiding now?

Novakula predicts the next SCOTUS nominee... as do I

Robert Novak: The next madame justice

Bob Novak predicts it will be Priscilla Owen. He has better sources than I do, but (surprise, surprise) I beg to differ with his conclusion.

I predicted before Roberts got the nod that Janice Rodgers Brown would be his pick. Now that the Katrina disaster has made race a front-burner question, I think it is even more likely that she will be picked this time.

Bush's approach to this issue has been remarkably consistent: "Ah cain't be no racist -- look at Condi and Colin!" A few high profile appointments are used as a sort of beard to hide the real ugliness. Appointment of a black woman to the Supremes is going to look like a solution to these bozos.

Monday, September 12, 2005

Welcome back, Poor Man

In a rare admission of fallibilty from an administration reluctant to admit error, the White House today publicly admitted that its response to hurricane Katrina was “not timely”, and promised a more “pro-active” response to future crises. Speaking candidly to reporters in the press briefing room, Press Secretary Scott McClellan delivered a critical appraisal of the administration’s recent efforts, and detailed changes that would ensure a swifter and more effective deployment of federal resources.
...
McClellan explained how lack of advance planning caused delays in the administration’s first response to the hurricane. “In those first hours, critical time was lost because we weren’t prepared to blame state and local officials. Indeed, precious minutes were wasted trying to find out who was mayor of New Orleans, information that should have been made available as soon as Katrina formed. It’s not like this wasn’t predicted. With these early missteps we lost the initiative, and we never fully recovered.”

McClellan revealed that the White House would be teaming with NSA scientists to create a massive computer database of lesser officials around the country who could be blamed in the event of an emergency. From governors and mayors on down to local police chiefs and EMTs, the Super-Computing Accountability Preventition Engine and Government Official Absolving Tool, or SCAPEGOAT, would create a cross-referenced list of patsies nanoseconds after detecting bad press. This would be the first step of a massive government reorganization, which would see FEMA dissolved, and it, along with the rest of the government, folded into a new department called FEMMA, the Federal Emergency Media Management Agency, to be headed by Karl Rove. FEMMA would employ a full-time staff of thousands of firemen, soldiers, fighter pilots, astronauts, and other heroic figures for the President to pose with in case of emergency, as well as a state-of-the-art Hollywood soundstage where the President could comfort stunt-victims in an endless array of convincing and topical disaster milieux. This would enable the President to perform all his critical photo-op duties without having to risk the unflattering moments that often plague real scenes of human suffering.


Man oh man, when the Poor Man hits his stride, he is a thing to behold.

FEMA chief Brown resigns post

Did he jump or was he pushed?

My guess -- yes.

WaPo's Rathergate

Armando @ Daily Kos takes Howard Krz @ the WaPo to task on the way they got suckered by an "anonymous source" within the White House on the "when did Blanco declare a state of emergency" story. Armando thinks Howie missed the point:
Howie -- the story is NOT about whether WaPo should blow its anonymous source --- the story is about WaPo's egregious unprofessionalism.

Howie, Spencer, Michael, have you guys heard of Google? How about a telephone? It would have taken you all of 10 seconds to check that fact. Or better yet, did you have any state officials as sources for your story? And if not, why not? Were you just doing stenography for BushCo?

Finally, why would you need a source to go anonymous on a fact that was a matter of public record?

The point is simple --- this was horrendously bad journalism. The fact that Blanco DID declare a state of emergency was central to the story. The fact she DID declare a state of emergency completely undermined the story. The fact is that the Washington Post's journalism on this story is every bit as bad or worse than the journalism much berated by you Howie in Rathergate.


No question that WaPo's work utterly sucked. But I think both Armando and Howie miss the real point. The story is about anonymous sourcing. I'm working on a longer piece on the subject, but the upshot is that there is absolutely no long or short-term justification for protecting White House sources when they lie. None.

Shoddy work should of course be pointed out and ridiculed. But, giving the Post the benefit of the doubt, I will provisionally concede that being flat-out punked is probably not editorial policy. But Howie lets loose the mind-boggling admission that "We don't blow sources, period." As a firm believer in the freedom of the press, I utterly reject that formulation. It simply must be the case that there comes a point at which a source so abuses the power granted by such a blank check that the highest duty of the press -- to us, the public -- overrides the utilitarian benefits of a policy of shielding sources. The WaPo policy benefits only the powerful and Howie's access to them.

Downfall

Last night I watched the movie "Downfall."

See, there's this leader who, through propaganda and intimidation, took virtually unprecedented power from the other branches of his government. His military, overextended by wars of choice, was no longer able to defend at home. He became morose, alternately grandiose and raging. His inner circle was afraid to bring him bad news, reinforcing his sheltered bunker mentality. He showed an appalling lack of empathy for the suffering of his people as his enemies gained strength, expecting them to make great sacrifices for his futile causes.


But I digress... I was going to talk about the movie.

Republican governance drowns in the bowl of New Orleans

from corrente:
"New Orleans filling up like a bowl." Remember what Grover Norquist said? He said he wants to make government so small he can drown it in a bathtub. Well, under Bush we have a government that's large in size, but puny in performance—so I bet that's good enough for Grover.

"New Orleans filling up like a bowl." Yes, Norquist, Bush, and thirty years of Republican governance have succeeded. They've won. They finally drowned the government.

Republican governance drowned in the "bowl" of New Orleans. Too hollowed out, too puny, to function. Republican governance drowned in the bowl of New Orleans, along with thousands of American dead abandoned by a government that was too hollowed out, too puny, too conflicted, too politicized, too ideological, and too in denial to rescue them.

You put people in charge of the government who want to drown it, sooner or later it's going to drown.

Now it has. It's going to up to the American people to decide whether a drowned government is the kind of government they want.

I'm betting Americans don't want a drowned government. And it's going to be up to what remains of the Democratic party to find a spine and fight and win on their behalf.


Actually, a big, expensive and ineffective government should be everyone's nightmare. But there's wasteful spending and then there's wasteful spending. Shoveling billions into the pockets of defense and energy companies bothers Bush, Norquist et al. not in the slightest. Because redistribution from poor to rich makes a government pretty damned effective in their view.

Has anybody seen attendance figures for the "Freedom Walk"?

I can't find a single news report giving attendance numbers. The AP story, repeated in hundreds of newspapers, says that "Several thousand people joined in the 'America Supports You Freedom Walk,' a demonstration organized by the Defense Department," but no specific figures or even estimates are given. Odd, because no one was supposed to be allowed in without prior registration. Which means the Government has pretty damned exact numbers that it isn't sharing.

And does anybody else gag when they see phrases like "demonstration organized by the Defense Department"?

Sunday, September 11, 2005

FSM pics up (gives off?) steam

Telegraph News In the beginning there was the Flying Spaghetti Monster

In the past few weeks, the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has become perhaps the world's fastest-growing "religion" and maybe its most improbable. While no one can be sure of the exact numbers of "Pastafarians", as acolytes are called, they may number in the millions.


Ramen, brother.

The re-sinking of the Titanic

New piece @ Raw Story.

Man on fire -- Digby nails it again

Digby knows why Bush hasn't fired Brown -- the same reason John Gotti couldn't whack Sammy Gravano. Brown knows where the bodies are buried on previous episodes of FEMA graft in Jeb-ville.

See? Bush does believe in science

Cover-up: toxic waters 'will make New Orleans unsafe for a decade'

Toxic chemicals in the New Orleans flood waters will make the city unsafe for full human habitation for a decade, a US government official has told The Independent on Sunday. And, he added, the Bush administration is covering up the danger.

In an exclusive interview, Hugh Kaufman, an expert on toxic waste and responses to environmental disasters at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said the way the polluted water was being pumped out was increasing the danger to health.

The pollution was far worse than had been admitted, he said, because his agency was failing to take enough samples and was refusing to make public the results of those it had analysed. "Inept political hacks" running the clean-up will imperil the health of low-income migrant workers by getting them to do the work.
...
Few people are better qualified to judge the extent of the problem. Mr Kaufman, who has been with the EPA since it was founded 35 years ago, helped to set up its hazardous waste programme. After serving as chief investigator to the EPA's ombudsman, he is now senior policy analyst in its Office of Solid Wastes and Emergency Response. He said the clean-up needed to be "the most massive public works exercise ever done", adding: "It will take 10 years to get everything up and running and safe."

Mr Kaufman claimed the Bush administration was playing down the need for a clean-up: the EPA has not been included in the core White House group tackling the crisis. "Its budget has been cut and inept political hacks have been put in key positions," Mr Kaufman said. "All the money for emergency response has gone to buy guns and cowboys - which don't do anything when a hurricane hits. We were less prepared for this than we would have been on 10 September 2001."

See, we'll put the poor blacks back in NOLA, and see how the pollution affects them. That there's what you call science. Maybe we could give 'em syphilis again, too.



see web stats