Reverse Engineering
Army Contract Official Critical of Halliburton Pact Is Demoted - New York Times
I am a believer in the power of reverse engineering. Make whatever claims you want about yourself and about your motives; I'll come to my own conclusions from examination of what you actually do. And based on what the managers of our military-industrial establishment do, it is obvious that the their goal is to transfer as much wealth as possible to Halliburton and other cronies of the Republican machine. Greenhouse was serious about the job the rest of us think she was supposed to, which runs 180 degrees counter to the job her masters expected her to do. So of course they judged her performance to be poor.
A top Army contracting official who criticized a large, noncompetitive contract with the Halliburton Company for work in Iraq was demoted Saturday for what the Army called poor job performance.
The official, Bunnatine H. Greenhouse, has worked in military procurement for 20 years and for the past several years had been the chief overseer of contracts at the Army Corps of Engineers, the agency that has managed much of the reconstruction work in Iraq.
...
Ms. Greenhouse's lawyer, Michael Kohn, called the action an "obvious reprisal" for the strong objections she raised in 2003 to a series of corps decisions involving the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root, which has garnered more than $10 billion for work in Iraq.
...
"She is being demoted because of her strict adherence to procurement requirements and the Army's preference to sidestep them when it suits their needs," Mr. Kohn said Sunday in an interview. He also said the Army had violated a commitment to delay Ms. Greenhouse's dismissal until the completion of an inquiry by the Pentagon's inspector general.
...
Known as a stickler for the rules on competition, Ms. Greenhouse initially received stellar performance ratings, Mr. Kohn said. But her reviews became negative at roughly the time she began objecting to decisions she saw as improperly favoring Kellogg Brown & Root, he said. Often she hand-wrote her concerns on the contract documents, a practice that corps leaders called unprofessional and confusing.
In October 2004, General Strock, citing two consecutive performance reviews that called Ms. Greenhouse an uncooperative manager, informed her that she would be demoted.
Ms. Greenhouse fought the demotion through official channels, and publicly described her clashes with Corps of Engineers leaders over a five-year, $7 billion oil-repair contract awarded to Kellogg Brown & Root. She had argued that if urgency required a no-bid contract, its duration should be brief.
Ms. Greenhouse had also fought the granting of a waiver to Kellogg Brown & Root in December 2003, approving the high prices it had paid for fuel imports for Iraq, and had objected to extending its five-year contract for logistical support in the Balkans for 11 months and $165 million without competitive bidding. In late June, ignoring warnings from her superiors, Ms. Greenhouse appeared before a Congressional panel, calling the Kellogg Brown & Root oil contract "the most blatant and improper contract abuse I have witnessed during the course of my professional career." She also said the defense secretary's office had improperly interfered in the awarding of the contract.
I am a believer in the power of reverse engineering. Make whatever claims you want about yourself and about your motives; I'll come to my own conclusions from examination of what you actually do. And based on what the managers of our military-industrial establishment do, it is obvious that the their goal is to transfer as much wealth as possible to Halliburton and other cronies of the Republican machine. Greenhouse was serious about the job the rest of us think she was supposed to, which runs 180 degrees counter to the job her masters expected her to do. So of course they judged her performance to be poor.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home