Is conservative snark an oxymoron?

When I want a quick pick-me-up giggle, I often wander on over to JimmyJeff GannonGuckert's place. Today I found him again imitating his betters, this time by trying to do snark:

International incident averted
Vandals broke into a New York state Catholic church and urinated in the holy water. No claims of desecration were made because an investigation revealed that there was not a copy of the Koran in the baptismal font and no American soldiers were involved. Senator Dick Durbin had no comment.

I hadn't thought about the point until reading this weak-ass nonsense, but has anyone else noticed that there just isn't any good conservative snark? Seems to me that if the would-be snarker isn't fairly bright and well-read, what you get is kinda like an eggless souffle - most of the ingredients are there, but it just won't stand up. And so, as in this case, you get a typically ham-fisted bit of drool that makes exactly the opposite point from that intended. To wit: the teens responsible for this nastiness were charged with multiple felonies for their actions. The fact that the American soldiers who desecrated Korans are likely, given past practice, to get the Medal of Freedom, and that there might be something wrong with both acts, escapes his feeble grasp.

Can anyone show me a successful example of right-wing snark? Bueller? Anyone?